Last published posts

What is Web Performance Testing and Why do You Need It?
Posted on

Performance testing is one of the most challenging components of web application testing. Irrelevant web performance test data or wrong metrics, chosen during testing, cost companies a ton of money and effort. If done right, performance testing has all the tools needed to forecast product behavior and its response to user’s actions with an impressive…
Read more…

Load Testing vs Stress Testing
Posted on

Load testing and stress testing are both means of performance testing, so it’s not easy to draw a line of distinction between the two. However, while load testing assesses the software performance under some expected load (regular or peak), stress testing pushes the bar beyond peak conditions to determine the system’s load capacity as well…
Read more…

Volume Testing in Software Testing: Definition & Examples
Posted on

Since no testing activities, other than volume tests, check the ability of the system to process large data pools, there’s no reasonable way for teams to skip volume testing. If undetected, issues like data processing and storage issues can lead to security jeopardy or system shutdown.  It’s a volume tester’s job to ensure the software…
Read more…

Quality Gates Next methodology

We have seen approaches to software development change swiftly in recent years. Practices such as Agile, Continuous Integration/Delivery, and DevOps have become mainstream. Developers are transforming the product creation process, using not only a different approach to organizing the work but also fundamentally new technologies. How is the quality creation process changing in this paradigm? Obviously, the QA department is gaining a lot of new ways to improve product quality. How can you know how effective your quality assurance process is in this new and agile world?

It must be recognized that a large number of familiar consulting models employed previously to assess the maturity and effectiveness of testing and quality assurance processes have become outdated together with the former processes. Many consulting companies analyze the effectiveness of quality assurance processes. Performance Lab is one such company focused on QA services. It possesses ISTQB, CMMI, and COBiT certifications.

Performance Lab audits the maturity and effectiveness of software quality assurance processes using its own patented Quality Gates Next methodology, which considers the IT-product creation process as a quality assurance pipeline. The result of the audit is not only information about the process’s level of maturity in the familiar terminology of TPI or CMMI, but also a detailed technical description of every hole found through which quality is leaking during product creation.

The Quality Gates Next methodology provides eight quality gates that the product must pass before it is released. Each gate contains specific quality checks that the product must pass in order to move to the next phase. A similar philosophy is familiar to many developers who practice unit testing.

The old approaches most often resulted in the team starting to think about quality only when development was finished. Testers receive a raw product that is simply overflowing with bugs, and diligently set to filing them. This takes an inexcusable amount of time in today’s world, and, unfortunately, often forces IT managers to sacrifice quality in order to meet deadlines for releasing the product.

An audit based on the Quality Gates Next methodology can not only illuminate the problems but also provide valuable recommendations regarding quality assurance, beginning with the earliest stages of development. Thus, testing and quality assurance no longer lag behind the new development methodologies. The synergy between development and testing will yield results in the form of an organic reduction in time to market and increased product quality.

Author: Yuri Kovalev, founding partner @Performance Lab